Pilot's Associate: a minute of flight, two hours of computing
In March 1988 the Lockheed and US Air Force team, and in June the McDonnell Aircraft team, gave the second demonstration of the Pilot's Associate, a DARPA and Air Force programme begun in February 1986 for Strategic Computing: expert systems assisting a pilot in a simulated cockpit. At McDonnell fully integrated software supported only one of six mission segments: a minute of flight took about two hours of processing.
Why it matters
The demonstration showed the distance between a set of expert systems on symbolic machines and real time: about 120 to 1 at McDonnell, and Lockheed's demonstration was not in real time either. The Air Force's Wright Laboratory authors nonetheless call it a success, technical and operational, after which DARPA steered the programme towards the avionics processors of an existing or planned aircraft.
Teams led by Lockheed-Georgia Company and McDonnell Aircraft Company began development after a competition in fiscal 1986, per DARPA's budget of February 1987. Lockheed gave Demo 2 in a laboratory cockpit driven by six Symbolics machines and a VAX and, since it was not in real time, produced a real-time replay of the mission. McDonnell worked on six Explorers and a microVAX in ART from Inference Corporation. Its repeat, Demonstration 2X, was set for February 1989 with a goal of 10 to 1: a single-ship mission against a column of tanks at a nominal 200 feet and 450 knots, the aircraft modelled on the F-15, the cockpit in a 40-foot dome. Lockheed held Demo 3 in November 1989; McDonnell's was not scheduled until October 1990. What the record does not claim: Lockheed's IEEE Expert paper was read only in snippets from the Internet Archive's full-text search; the rest comes from the Wright Laboratory paper for AGARD, which describes the McDonnell team. No document read gives contract values. That later demonstrations truly ran in real time: the authors write that the 2X system was a functional skeleton and that claims of real time must be judged with that caveat.